![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I don't know if this would REALLY be considered spoilerish or not, and it's certainly not some in depth analysis. However, two things stood out to me about last night's episode:
1) Zoe reminded me of another overzealous, trouble-finding redhead we all love (too bad there wasn't a Lindsay Boxer there to save her!). What is it about redheads and trouble?!
2) Emily was conspicuously absent during the baby gushfest at the beginning of the episode. I don't know about the women you know, but every straight woman I know goes all gooey eyed and mushy over babies, and they will swarm you to see pictures...so, where was Emily? Hmmmm, just food for thought..
What do you all think?
1) Zoe reminded me of another overzealous, trouble-finding redhead we all love (too bad there wasn't a Lindsay Boxer there to save her!). What is it about redheads and trouble?!
2) Emily was conspicuously absent during the baby gushfest at the beginning of the episode. I don't know about the women you know, but every straight woman I know goes all gooey eyed and mushy over babies, and they will swarm you to see pictures...so, where was Emily? Hmmmm, just food for thought..
What do you all think?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-19 04:54 pm (UTC)I thought Emily was a little absent in this episode, but there was a lack of JJ/Emily/Garcia interaction. I really hope they don't end up sticking her with Morgan; that would just be weird all the way around.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-19 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-19 07:47 pm (UTC)That scene at the end with JJ and Rossi probably got their shippers all in a tizzy though. *gags* Sorry, threw up in my mouth a little at the thought of them together. *shudders*
*runs off to find sanity*
no subject
Date: 2009-02-19 09:06 pm (UTC)*stomps foot* Dang it, I was some good Emily/JJ subtext. This isn't fair! They're hardly in a room together anymore unless it's as a group! Forget them even being alone together anymore.
*growls*
no subject
Date: 2009-02-20 12:26 am (UTC)Let's give it a bit more time. Maybe we'll get something more worthwhile than Emily's gag-me face when JJ explained the ring in last week's episode (btw, was she even wearing it last night?).
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 05:31 pm (UTC)And gee, thanks for the TMI. Sweetie, you don't need the white dress and the ring...you two are as good as married if he does that around you. Oh, and it's only going to get worse just so you know. ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-19 10:37 pm (UTC)I agree with your two points though. I even thought I might get sick at the baby photo gushing session *yuck*
The case was interesting but I think the writers messes it up this time. It had way more potential then was displayed.
And what's up with the constant JJ/Rossi team up?? Soooo annoying!
no subject
Date: 2009-02-20 12:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-20 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-20 08:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-20 08:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 05:41 pm (UTC)You can mention it here as often as you like
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 07:16 pm (UTC)Good thing I have this little haven because I think I'd hurt someone otherwise. ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-20 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-20 11:25 am (UTC)And I totally agree with the sentiments that are running through this comment thread thus far. What the hell is up with all of the Rossi centric plot lines lately? Can they seriously not come up with anything better? I mean how many times do we have to watch him regret his actions or his past... Sorry. /endrant
They are certainly setting Emily up for something. As disgusted as she looked with the whole ring bit last week? I mean, that was blatantly obvious. Just glad we should finally get to know within the next couple of weeks. You can only drag this shit out for so long.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 05:38 pm (UTC)